Hello
Gentle Reader,
The
Swedish Academy’s membership is once again going to experience further change
at the recent death of computational linguist and former Permanent Secretary of
the Swedish Academy, Sture Allén who died earlier this week at the age of 93. Through
the latter half of the 1980’s and the vast majority of the 1990’s, Sture Allén held
the position of Permanent Secretary of the Swedish Academy, functioning as the
academy’s spokesperson and operational face. Throughout Allén’s exceptionally
lengthy reign, the Swedish Academy went through a series of controversial
turbulent times, beginning in 1988 during the Rushdie Affair (or “The Satanic
Verses,” Controversy) when the Swedish Academy remained silent regarding the fatwa
issued against Saman Rushdie. The incident was a standing point where writers
and activists across the world, rallied against the death threat and sentence
issued against Rushdie, with many citing decrying the order as a baseless
attack against freedom of speech, expression, thought, and one’s ability to
have oppositional or opposing views to others dogmatic decrees. As a literary institute,
there was a reasonable expectation that the Swedish Academy would condemn the death
threat issued against Salman Rushdie. Under Sture Allén, however, the Swedish
Academy remained inactive and silent, which resulted in three members (at the
time) symbolically resigning from their positions on the Academy, these three
members were: Werner Aspenström (Chair No. 12), former Permanent Secretary Lars
Gyllensten (Chair No. 14), and Kerstin Ekman (Chair No. 15). This could be
described as Sture Allén’s first example of moral failure. In the 1990’s, Sture
Allén would receive a letter detailing sordid allegations of sexual assault
committed by a husband of a former committee member (Katarina Frostenson); Allén
disregarded the letter, which in the coming decades would come back to haunt
the Swedish Academy with the 2018 scandal blowing apart the institution which
was known as being stoic and secretive, and in turn revealed an archaic organization
with a rotting festering underbelly of moral and ethical ineptitude, but could hide
behind the gold, the gilding, and the Nobel Prize to hid their own putrid
realities. In the end, the late and former Sara Danius suffered the negligence and
inattentiveness of Sture Allén’s inaction. Yet, during the late 80’s and 90’s
(with minor exceptions) the Nobel Prize for Literature was aptly awarded to some
of the greatest writers and most recognizable laureates of the time: Naguib
Mahfouz, Octavio Paz, Derek Walcott, Toni Morrison, Seamus Heaney, and the
marvelous Wislwa Szymborska. It was also during this time; the Nobel Prize for
Literature truly began to take on a more global perspective. In this Sture Allé
can be praised for finishing the job of taking the Nobel Prize for Literature
to further global reaches and achieve some sense of synthesis beyond its own provincialism
and centric view of literature in a very narrow confines, and instead take a
holistic approach to the application of the Nobel Prize for Literature and
Alfred Nobel’s will and testament, while treating the award as if it were a
traditional literary award. In turn, Sture Allén’s reign would not be described
as one without corrupting questions of lacking moral probity and ethical
consideration. In fact these two facets remain the darkest and deepest
blemishes on computational linguists legacy and memory.
Thank-you
For Reading Gentle Reader
Take Care
And As Always
Stay Well Read
M.
Mary
Take Care
And As Always
Stay Well Read
No comments:
Post a Comment