The Birdcage Archives

Tuesday 17 July 2018

A Night Spent with Wisława Szymborska

Hello Gentle Reader

The late poet and Nobel Laureate, Wisława Szymborska, was often noted for being shy or reclusive. She never traveled abroad as a visiting lecturer; she rarely gave interviews, and was fiercely protective of her privacy. For this she was famously called: “the Greta Garbo of world poetry.” Yet this depiction is often unkindly inappropriate, as it paints the poet as a dangerous brown-recluse spider, where she would attack with venom and vitriol, in the event someone trespassed on her shadow, let alone approached her. She may have declined interviews, she may have been shy (even bashful), and she certainly had no desire to engage or lecture on aspects of poetry; but she was never hostile. In fact friends remember the late poet as an incredibly generous, kind, warm and personable person, who possessed a endearing wit and gentle humour, spiked with a keen eye for the ironic. She just happened to facilitate a distinction between her poetry and herself. She firmly believed that her poems stated enough on their own, and never required her assistance in promotion or clarification. She once stated in an interview, when asked why didn’t give interviews (or how rare they were) she is said to have replied (according to herself in the documentary: “End and Beginning: Meeting Wisława Szymborska):

“Because at the time of my birth I signed a contract . . . and there was no mention of giving interviews.”

She would further state:

“And anyway, an interview is only interesting if the author—the person who is interviewed, talks about himself. And I don’t like talking about myself.”

She further ruminates that journalist ask about politics, which is yet another topic she does not prefer to discuss either. She often joked about the lives of poets when compared to scientists or artists; where great films can be made about their lives and their discoveries, or their artistic achievements. But for a poet she ironically coos in her Nobel lecture:

“But poets are the worst. Their work is hopelessly unphotogenic. Someone sits at a table or lies on a sofa while staring motionless at a wall or ceiling. Once in a while this person writes down seven lines only to cross out one of them fifteen minutes later, and then another hour passes, during which nothing happens ... Who could stand to watch this kind of thing?

(Szymborska, Wisława: The Poet and The World. Retrieved from nobelprize.org.)

Even during her Nobel Lecture in nineteen-ninety six, the poet was hesitant to discuss the subject of poetry. Her lecture is known as being of the shortest lectures ever given. Even during her lecture, where she was to discuss poetry in some regard or another, she skeptically and humorously danced around the subject, evading any concrete statement on the matter. Yet she entertains poets, with regard to humanity as a whole. Though she confesses poetry in itself is not a profession, and therefore makes it sound rather frivolous. Despite this, she assures though in attendance and reading at later dates:  all poets wish to be read, appreciated and understood. She mentions the eccentric poets of previous years; ones who, dressed up in a variety of costumes and dresses; and behaved unconventionally. But they too would have to resign themselves from the party at one time or another shut the door and confront the white page, which is the only aspect of poetry that matters.

When it came to inspiration, Wisława Szymborska makes it quite clear no profession—especially poetry—has any monopoly on the matter. Yet, she expresses thanks to how grateful all poets (as well as: writers, artists, scientists, academics, philosophers) should be, in order to pursue their inclinations and predictions, which allows them to transcend the daily grind of existence. Where she counts them as ‘Fortunes darlings.’

Wisława Szymborska’s reticence on the matter of poetry and her reluctance to participating in interviews, worked in her favour. She steadily and skillfully avoided the pitfalls of falling into the snares of windbaggery—so in the event she did decide to discuss a matter or offer some insight or perspective on the matter of poetry, it was never stale or being reiterated. Her statements carried original thought and lighthearted gravity on the subject. Her gem like statements are few and far between, and are tragically brief. She never spoke for long on the subject of poetry, and rarely extended or elucidated her statements. Yet thankfully, towards the end of her life, she participated in a documentary by the Dutch journalist and filmmaker, John Albert Jansen, called: “End and Beginning: Meeting Meeting Wisława Szymborska,” which has been produced and distributed (I believe) by Jansen’s film company: Oogland Film Productions.

The other night, I had the wonderful opportunity to watch the above mentioned documentary. In just a short fifty-five minutes, Wisława Szymborska becomes a subject of film, all the while evading the microscope like glare and curiosity of the camera. When she is on the screen, her attention is directed away from the camera towards a friend (Ewa Lipska) or perhaps John Albert Jansen himself. She rarely looks into the camera, but when she does there’s a mischievous glint in her eyes, as she tells an anecdote or a joke. She is curiously evasive, and when is shown she appears distant, as she declines to acknowledge the cameras presence for long. It becomes concrete: Wisława Szymborska, poet and person; despite being a subject of a film is not a spectacle or an exhibit. This casual distance, however, only strengthens the intimacy of the documentary. Rather than making Szymborska a subject open to questioning and interrogations; while having her talk to her friends or other guests in her apartment, allows the viewers to become a casual observer of her usual interactions.

The films subject as already discussed is Wisława Szymborska, who artfully dodges and weaves away from the harsh glares of the camera. The film is intercepted with poetry readings, commentary from Szymborska and friends, as well as poetic scenes of urban and rural landscapes. In one particular scene, Ewa Lipska escorts camera and viewer to: Krupnicza Street number 22, where she informs them that it was a famous residence of many post-war polish writers, including Wisława Szymborska and her then husband Adam Włodek (they divorced in 1958, but remained good friends throughout their lives. He died in 1986). The scene is winter, and the sky a grey twilight. Ewa Lipska, stands beneath curved art nouveau like balconies, while the snow acts on its nature, and beckons gravities calls. In the distance sires ring out. The landscape is bleak and draped in greys, the concrete buildings lament better times. Yet, Lipska remembers fondly the memories of the time, when Wisława Szymborska lived there, and when Lipska herself inhabited the place later on. The parties they had were famous, she states; and remembers how one woman—a real looker—name Lola, had an admirer who would come and sit on the iron spiral staircase, and play his guitar for her. These private concerts usually took place after he was released from jail.

Of course no film about the poet could ever miss discussing the Nobel Prize. With humour found in her poems, friends describe the situation during the Nobel dinner, where Wisława Szymborska, lit a cigarette after the dinner. Of course, there was no smoking permitted in the gala dinner, in the Stockholm town hall. Dinner is served in gilded plates. Yet the dear poet, seated next to his majesty the King, lit a cigarette anyway. The king, according to the friends, seeing no other way out of the situation, lit a cigarette alongside her; and with slight humour there two wisps of smoke could be seen drifting in the sterile hall. This is just one of the many stories shared (not in the documentary but all around) with regards to Wisława Szymborska and the Nobel Prize—often referred to as: The Stockholm Tragedy, by friends and acquaintances.

The film closes with friends describing the poet. Each one comments on her remarkability as a legend of world poetry, while retaining her discretion and independence, where she is not enveloped or surrounded by gossip. One called her reserved, and warned if she did not maintain that reserved tone she would fall to pieces. Another praises her ability to imagine the different manifestations of people, and with thoughtful (and once again) reserved precision, depicts and celebrates them. Another, remarks on his admiration for the late poet and her acute perspective of the world, where she could cut through the difficulties of life like a razorblade, and with knowledge and wit, understand the irony, the beauty, and the ever splendid pleasures of the reality called life. This same friend has offered the best description of Szymborska’s poetry—it’s true, she is often called the Mozart of World Poetry, but the title is strikingly pompous and does not fit with the diminutive and graceful Wisława Szymborska—he called her poetry, constrained prose, which I found to be a fitting image of her poetry. Her poetry is deceptively simple, but welcoming and approachable. Within a few lines, Szymborska can at once celebrate the wonders and mysteries of life, and in the next, playfully scold human beings for being erring and unnecessarily vain, only to once again celebrate the mistakes they make.

End and Beginning: Meeting Wisława Szymborska,” would not be called a biographical film or documentary that is biographical in nature either. It’s a wonderful depiction of the poet, as well as portrait painted by friends. She is not seen sitting at the kitchen table or laying on the kitchen sofa, staring vacantly into space waiting for inspiration, she is gracefully animate as she talks, reminisces, and reads her poetry. Yet as a subject, she is easily elusive and evades being integrated or questioned. It’s an intimate film and a wonderful watch. Certainly my night with Wisława Szymborska, was well spent and a true delight. Fair warning though Gentle Reader, in the event you are able to see the film, and you watch it, do not expect Szymborska to betray her reticence; she may have welcomed the camera into the her home, and talked with friends, recited poetry, and told anecdotes, she never betrays her discretions or betrays her thoughts.

Thank-you For Reading Gentle Reader
Take Care
And As Always
Stay Well Read

M. Mary

No comments:

Post a Comment